Can it be true that our next league fixture is yet again against a team that has a new manager? I was looking forward to the Hammers’ game thinking we had a fair chance of all three points but now with a new manager bounce we all know what will happen :0((
Replies
Surely you should know better, we cannot beat teams below us. A draw at best.
posted by Riverside (Guest) - Wednesday 08th January 2025, 5:10 PM
Erm Brighton Small bentford Palarse Leicester !!
posted by Jim (Guest) - Wednesday 08th January 2025, 6:32 PM
Southampton stepped up for one game after their manager got the sack, and that was against us and since, they lost every game. Luckily Villa is Potter’s first game and their bounce will not last beyond that!!
posted by JohnC (Guest) - Wednesday 08th January 2025, 6:43 PM
We never get anything against Wet Spam
posted by Ted (Guest) - Wednesday 08th January 2025, 7:52 PM
There is another way the stats could work in our favour? We have a good winning record against Potter...
posted by OWEN - Wednesday 08th January 2025, 8:17 PM
Clearly last season passed you by Ted!!
posted by MST (Moderator) - Wednesday 08th January 2025, 8:47 PM
Last year was an outlier. In the EPL the score is 15 - 6 to Wet Spam and 8- 1 at their ground. Have you have already forgotten the match at CC where we were all over them but dropped 2 points in the dying minutes. Perhaps I should have said we "rarely" get anything at Wet Spam.
posted by Ted (Guest) - Thursday 09th January 2025, 6:20 AM
The big advantage we have against WH is we have a better side and a better Manager
posted by FULHAM SUPPORTER (Guest) - Thursday 09th January 2025, 6:22 AM
ted, didnt we get six points last season, from the club you say we never get anything from?
posted by old tich redding (Guest) - Thursday 09th January 2025, 5:28 PM
ted being negative- again.
posted by george swoon (Guest) - Thursday 09th January 2025, 5:31 PM
Perhaps you should read posts before commenting Old Snitch
posted by Ted (Guest) - Friday 10th January 2025, 2:57 AM
ted, after that remark you made about palhinha some months ago, i dont know how you have the nerve to come on here and criticise anything at all. your stroppy comments are not welcome, including the last one. i notice you insulted tich, but not the moderator-typical teddy!
posted by craven image (Guest) - Friday 10th January 2025, 4:20 PM
ted, you dont always put much thought into many of your posts, so you shouldnt really be stroppy when you are challenged. i remember some months ago, you posted an appalling remark that received a rebuke before it was deleted- you will remember it was about jose palhinha, and it was so bitter. opinions are welcome, but insults, like you said to old tich, not funny.
posted by covent cratage (Guest) - Friday 10th January 2025, 4:31 PM
-two similar postings- are they the same person, or are they just telling the truth?-or is it you, ted?
posted by uvavu. (Guest) - Friday 10th January 2025, 4:36 PM
Finally Snout shows his hand again posting under multiple names, old snith, George Swoon, craven image and now convent cottage, agreeing with himself as no one else does. Go back to your homework child.
posted by Ted (Guest) - Saturday 11th January 2025, 12:30 PM
you managed to get my name wrong, which is nothing new for you, i dont know snout, or any of the others, despite what you believe. there have been a fair number using the craven tag, thats up to them. soothsayer used to be hoops. please ted, if you are going to insult, try something a bit more original. now go back to your alphabet homework.
posted by covent cratage (Guest) - Saturday 11th January 2025, 3:21 PM