I woke up no richer. Burnham out now.
Replies
Be fair, give him a week to destroy himself.
posted by AC (Guest) - Saturday 18th July 2026, 11:22 AM
All Right-me-Ducks-!!!!!!!
posted by OWEN - Saturday 18th July 2026, 12:22 PM
You’ve no idea what is coming. I’d stock up on tinned goods and camping stoves if I was you lot.
posted by Kemi Goodenoch (Guest) - Saturday 18th July 2026, 3:08 PM
If you have come here in a dinghy you have no worries, as us taxpayers will make sure that you are fed and watered, and you will have good medical attention, with money to spend. It still puzzles me, why you want to come here in the first place, you poor unfortunate souls. ?
posted by LTS (Guest) - Saturday 18th July 2026, 8:15 PM
LTS, you forgot to mention, the lovely council houses that these poor wretched people are entitled too. You know, the ones that our own hard up people, just can't have.
posted by GEORGE H (Guest) - Saturday 18th July 2026, 8:22 PM
Great thing Maggie did for working-
class people and it is nice to read the good feeling stories from real genuine working class ordinary folks that are happy Maggie gave them the opportunities and a great start in life contrary to what the Deluded Burnham is saying. More power to the unions will bring on more strikes and back to the seventies and not what we need. Yes' we will get a pay rise through the unions but Labour will rain us with taxes all over the place.
posted by OWEN - Saturday 18th July 2026, 10:28 PM
We now have a proper Labour PM who will improve the lives of the poor by taking money for the very rich and will renationalise the poorly run railways, gas, electric and water companies. These services will be then run for the benefit of the customers not for the benefit of shareholders.
posted by The Time Is Now - Sunday 19th July 2026, 6:06 AM
You’re deluded TTIN if you believe the utilities and rail companies worked well when they were nationalised. Clearly you weren’t around in the ‘70s! Labour government = high taxes, high borrowing, high debt, low standard of living. Nothing’s changed and never will under a left wing government.
posted by MST (Moderator) - Sunday 19th July 2026, 7:15 AM
I wonder where the money will come from nationalising the utilities and railway. It isn’t just about finding money to bring it back to the state, money to fund the debt these companies have incurred and then the money to invest. We are talking billions and billions. Any more government debt to fund will be crazy. Nice idea but Burnham forgets the country cannot afford to own these companies and manage it properly. Just look at HS2. That’s a small project compared to upgrading all our utilities infrastructure. We couldn’t afford a socialists government in the 70/80’s and we certainly cannot afford that in 2030! Like brexit - nice idea but economically doesn’t work!
posted by JohnC (Guest) - Sunday 19th July 2026, 9:49 AM
You’re also free to slaughter UK citizens with virtual impunity. Calocane butchered 3 people and gets to stay in hospital claiming full benefits until he’s ‘cured’. Wayne Broadhurst was cut to ribbons walking his dog in Uxbridge by an asylum seeker and the CPS has accepted a plea of manslaughter because of mental health issues so the dinghy pilot will get a nice hospital stay on full benefits too. The country is now a cesspit filled with the world’s dregs and eyebrows Burnham will do nothing to change that.
posted by Kemi Goodenoch (Guest) - Sunday 19th July 2026, 12:39 PM
The privatisation of the utilities worked fine at the beginning because of the Golden Share system which meant the Government had a veto on who they allowed to buy shares. The EU banned this and the Labour Party changed UK law to fall in line with the rest of the EU. They could have stood up for the UK Most other other governments amended the rules to suit, in fact, the UK government has Golden Shares in certain important companies to protect them. Don’t blame privatisation, blame what came after.
posted by Keith Pundit (Guest) - Sunday 19th July 2026, 1:37 PM
Virtually bankrupt these utilities will not cost that much. I am not deluded all these services were better run nationalised it was only that mad right wing Thatcher who thought otherwise. I watched it all and was horrified and have Hated Thatcher ever since. Her closing all the coal mines as a way of punishment to the unions she hated because they stopped businessmen doing what they liked. That has made us so dependant on oil and gas now. We also have virtually no productive industry and that is all down to Thatcher. She single handily ruined this Country.
posted by The Time Is Now - Sunday 19th July 2026, 3:24 PM
Agree 100% Mr T !
posted by Mal (Guest) - Sunday 19th July 2026, 3:43 PM
TTIN' go back a few generations and you will probably find that some of those rich people did not start of rich if you know what i mean. Just imagine a rich great-great-uncle from one of your tribe left you a whole load of money and a farm for example. That rich farmer might have died from sweat and hard work, toiling the good land so we can all eat. We have a bad habit in this country and i should say the Labour and socialist lot to look over our neighbours' fence in envy and moan grudgingly at our neighbours' lot which is wrong. Royalty are a different proposition the saying goes, that Royalty does as they please and like them or not we should obey. Like it or not, there is a ranking hierarchy in this world and we already know the socialsist system does not work and besides there is corruption even in that just there is corruption everywhere. King Solomon was not vilified or cut down for his riches so we know that there will always be rich and poor in this world. Racheal Reeves claim to fame is doling out money and then saying poverty is no more which is a load of nonsense! If that was true we might as well all take a chill pill and receive free money sit down in our beds and order takeout and big macs and everything is hunkey-dorey. Burnham won't mess with the system because he is clever or he thinks he is. Burnham will instead give the powers to each councils and when they mess up, nothing sticks on him. We still have a lot to learn about Andy Burnham but the little we know is that he will make a number of U-turns because he is winging it but he learns fast. The big plan to go back to the good times before Thatcher will not work and it does, i will be the first to doff my cap to him, and i am not posh by the way.
posted by OWEN - Sunday 19th July 2026, 3:53 PM
Most coal mines were shut by Labour. Callaghan and Wilson closed more than twice as many as Thatcher.
posted by Keith Atlee (Guest) - Sunday 19th July 2026, 3:58 PM
Before Thatcher there were 3 day weeks. power cuts, strikes, riots. That was before we had an entire sub population of immigrants, benefit spongers and the lame and lazy PIP generation in their millions.
posted by Keith Atlee (Guest) - Sunday 19th July 2026, 4:09 PM
Sensible posts Owen and Keith. Totally agree. Lest we forget Mrs. T also saved the Malvinas from the Argies.
posted by MST (Moderator) - Sunday 19th July 2026, 4:16 PM
Spot on TIbor.
posted by Peter (Guest) - Sunday 19th July 2026, 4:36 PM
Poll tax anybody.
posted by Mal (Guest) - Sunday 19th July 2026, 6:36 PM
Poll tax was a good idea in principle it just needs more work. Why should my wife and I pay the same rates as the family of six two doors down. They use more services than we do. If they’d have used the same “pay per person” principle but linked it to property valuation and size as well as services used it would have been fine in my opinion. Problem was, a man and his wife earning gazillions per year living in a 20 bedroom mansion, using ten times more services, would have paid the same as my wife and I. Not very eloquently put but you get the gist.
posted by MST (Moderator) - Monday 20th July 2026, 7:40 AM
LTS, like you I am puzzled why so many refugees cross the channel aided and abetted by France, when they know many English people are struggling to make ends meet. It’s all a bit of a conundrum. ??
posted by bigboy4650 (Guest) - Monday 20th July 2026, 8:56 AM